Response playbooks, investigation guides, and Atomic Red Team tests are Pro-only. Upgrade to unlock the full detection package for THREAT-Recon-AutomatedVulnScannerSweep.

Upgrade to Pro
THREAT-Recon-AutomatedVulnScannerSweep Elastic Security · Elastic

Detect Automated Vulnerability Scanner Sweep Against External Attack Surface in Elastic Security

Before exploitation, most intrusions begin with active scanning of the target's external attack surface using automated vulnerability scanning tools such as sqlmap, Nikto, Nuclei, Acunetix, Nessus, OpenVAS, or WPScan. Attackers run these tools against internet-facing web applications, APIs, and edge devices to fingerprint software versions, enumerate misconfigurations, and identify exploitable CVEs before committing to an intrusion attempt. This scanning is typically noisy at the HTTP layer: high-volume requests for known vulnerable paths (e.g. /.env, /.git/config, /wp-login.php, /actuator/health, /phpmyadmin), distinctive scanner user-agent strings, and rapid sequential probing of many distinct URIs from a single source in a short window. Nation-state actors such as Volt Typhoon and APT41 routinely scan edge devices and web infrastructure ahead of exploitation attempts, while eCrime groups like FIN7 and Scattered Spider use commodity scanning frameworks to identify soft targets at scale. Detecting the scanning phase gives defenders a window to harden or patch before the attacker moves to Initial Access.

MITRE ATT&CK

Tactic
Reconnaissance

Elastic Detection Query

Elastic Security (Elastic)
eql
sequence by source.ip with maxspan=5m
  [network where event.dataset in ("f5_bigip.log", "imperva.waf", "fortinet_fortiweb.log", "cloudflare.waf") and
   http.response.status_code == 404] with runs=25
medium severity medium confidence

EQL detection for a single source IP generating 25+ HTTP 404 responses against WAF-protected web infrastructure within a 5-minute window, indicative of automated URI/path enumeration typical of vulnerability scanners.

Data Sources

Elastic F5 BIG-IP integrationElastic Fortinet FortiWeb integrationElastic Cloudflare integration

Required Tables

logs-f5_bigip*logs-fortinet_fortiweb*logs-cloudflare*

False Positives & Tuning

  • Search engine crawlers hitting stale/removed pages listed in an outdated sitemap
  • Authorised vulnerability scans not yet excluded from the rule

Other platforms for THREAT-Recon-AutomatedVulnScannerSweep


Testing Methodology

Validate this detection against 3 adversary techniques from Atomic Red Team. Each test below lists the behaviour to exercise and the telemetry you should expect to see. Executable commands and cleanup steps are available with Pro.

  1. Test 1Vulnerability Scanner User-Agent Simulation via curl

    Expected signal: WAF/reverse-proxy logs record inbound requests with the scanner user-agent strings in the Message or http_user_agent field.

  2. Test 2Sensitive Path Probing Simulation

    Expected signal: WAF/reverse-proxy logs show requests to each sensitive path, mostly resulting in 404 responses.

  3. Test 3Behavioral URI Enumeration Simulation via ffuf-style Loop

    Expected signal: WAF/reverse-proxy logs record 40 distinct URIs requested from the test source IP within a single 5-minute window, nearly all returning 404.

Unlock playbooks & atomic tests with Pro

Get the full detection package for THREAT-Recon-AutomatedVulnScannerSweep — response playbook and atomic red team tests, plus investigation guidance and hunting queries.

df00tech Pro — £29/user/month

Response PlaybookInvestigation GuideHunting QueriesAtomic Red Team TestsTuning Guidance

Related Detections