CVE-2026-48282

CVE-2026-48282: Adobe ColdFusion Path Traversal Exploitation

Detects exploitation attempts targeting CVE-2026-48282, a path traversal vulnerability (CWE-22) in Adobe ColdFusion. Active exploitation confirmed by CISA KEV listing. Attackers may use directory traversal sequences in HTTP requests to read sensitive files outside the web root, including configuration files containing credentials, or to achieve remote code execution via file write primitives.

Vulnerability Intelligence

KEV — Known Exploited

What is CVE-2026-48282 CVE-2026-48282: Adobe ColdFusion Path Traversal Exploitation?

CVE-2026-48282: Adobe ColdFusion Path Traversal Exploitation (CVE-2026-48282) maps to the Initial Access and Credential Access and Lateral Movement tactics — the adversary is trying to get into your network in MITRE ATT&CK.

This page provides production-ready detection logic for CVE-2026-48282: Adobe ColdFusion Path Traversal Exploitation, covering the data sources and telemetry it touches: IIS Web Logs, Azure Diagnostics, Microsoft Sentinel W3CIISLog. The queries below are rated critical severity at high confidence, and ship for 7 SIEM platforms — KQL, SPL, Elastic, QRadar, Sumo, YARA-L, LogScale.

MITRE ATT&CK

Tactic
Initial Access Credential Access Lateral Movement
Microsoft Sentinel / Defender
kusto
union W3CIISLog, AzureDiagnostics
| where TimeGenerated >= ago(24h)
| where csUriStem has_any ("../", "..%2f", "..%2F", "%2e%2e", "..%5c", "..%5C", ".%2e/", "%2e./")
    or csUriQuery has_any ("../", "..%2f", "..%2F", "%2e%2e", "..%5c", "..%5C")
    or csUriStem matches regex @"(\.\./|%2[eE]%2[eE]|%252[eE]%252[eE])"
| where csUriStem has_any (".cfm", ".cfc", "/CFIDE/", "/cfide/", "/cf_scripts/")
    or csUriStem has_any ("/administrator/", "/rest/", "/flex2gateway/")
| extend TraversalDepth = array_length(extract_all(@"(\.\./|%2[eE]%2[eE]/)", strcat(csUriStem, csUriQuery)))
| extend TargetedFile = extract(@"([\w.-]+\.(xml|properties|ini|pwd|pfx|p12|key|pem|cfm|cfc|log))$", 0, csUriStem)
| extend AttackerIP = iff(isnotempty(cIP), cIP, CallerIpAddress)
| where TraversalDepth >= 1 or isnotempty(TargetedFile)
| summarize
    RequestCount = count(),
    UniqueURIs = dcount(csUriStem),
    UniqueTargets = make_set(TargetedFile, 20),
    StatusCodes = make_set(scStatus, 10),
    FirstSeen = min(TimeGenerated),
    LastSeen = max(TimeGenerated)
    by AttackerIP, csHost, bin(TimeGenerated, 5m)
| where RequestCount >= 1
| extend SuccessfulTraversal = set_has_element(StatusCodes, "200")
| project-reorder LastSeen, AttackerIP, csHost, RequestCount, UniqueURIs, UniqueTargets, SuccessfulTraversal, StatusCodes

Detects HTTP requests to Adobe ColdFusion endpoints containing path traversal sequences in URI stem or query parameters. Summarizes traversal attempts by source IP and tracks whether any returned HTTP 200 (successful read).

critical severity high confidence

Data Sources

IIS Web Logs Azure Diagnostics Microsoft Sentinel W3CIISLog

Required Tables

W3CIISLog AzureDiagnostics

False Positives

  • Legitimate URL-encoded paths in complex REST API calls that coincidentally contain encoded dots
  • Web application vulnerability scanners (Burp Suite, Nessus, Qualys) running authorized assessments
  • CDN or reverse proxy health checks that encode special characters in forwarded URIs
  • Legacy ColdFusion applications that use relative paths in cfinclude tags surfacing in request logs

Sigma rule & cross-platform mapping

The detection logic for CVE-2026-48282: Adobe ColdFusion Path Traversal Exploitation (CVE-2026-48282) above is provided in a vendor-neutral form so you can deploy it on any SIEM. The same logic is shipped here as native KQL (Microsoft Sentinel / Defender), SPL (Splunk), Elastic (Elastic Security (EQL)), QRadar (IBM QRadar (AQL)), Sumo (Sumo Logic CSE), YARA-L (Google Chronicle / SecOps), LogScale (CrowdStrike LogScale (CQL)) queries. In Sigma terms, this detection targets the following logsource:

logsource:
  product: azure

Browse the community-maintained Sigma rules for this technique:


Testing Methodology

Validate this detection against 4 adversary techniques from Atomic Red Team. Each test below lists the behaviour to exercise and the telemetry you should expect to see. Executable commands and cleanup steps are available with Pro.

  1. Test 1ColdFusion Path Traversal - Read neo-security.xml via URL traversal

    Expected signal: IIS/Apache access log entry: GET /CFIDE/administrator/../../lib/neo-security.xml with source IP of test host. HTTP response code 200 if vulnerable, 400/403 if patched or WAF-blocked.

  2. Test 2ColdFusion Path Traversal - URL-encoded traversal to password.properties

    Expected signal: Web server access log entry with URL-encoded traversal sequence. If server decodes before logging, DecodedURI will contain '../lib/password.properties'. If logged raw, csUriStem will contain '%2e%2e%2f%2e%2e%2f'.

  3. Test 3ColdFusion Path Traversal - Double-encoded traversal sequence (%252e%252e)

    Expected signal: WAF logs should show the double-encoded payload. ColdFusion access logs may show decoded single-percent-encoded form if WAF decodes once before forwarding. Both log sources should be checked.

  4. Test 4ColdFusion Path Traversal - Enumerate ColdFusion web root via automated scan simulation

    Expected signal: Multiple web server access log entries from the same source IP within a short window, each containing traversal sequences targeting different ColdFusion configuration file paths. HTTP response sizes will differ based on file accessibility.

Unlock Pro Content

Get the full detection package for CVE-2026-48282 including response playbook, investigation guide, and atomic red team tests.

Response PlaybookInvestigation GuideHunting QueriesAtomic Red Team TestsTuning Guidance

Related Detections