CVE-2026-3910 IBM QRadar · QRadar

Detect CVE-2026-3910: Google Chromium V8 Memory Buffer Bounds Violation in IBM QRadar

Detects exploitation attempts and post-exploitation indicators related to CVE-2026-3910, an improper restriction of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer (CWE-119) in Google Chromium's V8 JavaScript engine. This vulnerability is actively exploited in the wild (CISA KEV) and may allow attackers to achieve remote code execution via a malicious web page, potentially leading to sandbox escape and full system compromise.

MITRE ATT&CK

Tactic
Initial Access Execution Privilege Escalation

QRadar Detection Query

IBM QRadar (QRadar)
sql
SELECT
  DATEFORMAT(starttime,'YYYY-MM-dd HH:mm:ss') AS event_time,
  sourceip,
  destinationip,
  destinationport,
  username,
  "Process Name",
  "Parent Process Name",
  QIDNAME(qid) AS event_name,
  logsourcename(logsourceid) AS log_source
FROM events
WHERE
  LOGSOURCETYPENAME(devicetype) IN ('Microsoft Windows Security Event Log','CrowdStrike Falcon')
  AND (
    (
      LOWER("Parent Process Name") LIKE '%chrome.exe'
      OR LOWER("Parent Process Name") LIKE '%msedge.exe'
    )
    AND LOWER("Process Name") IN ('cmd.exe','powershell.exe','wscript.exe','cscript.exe','mshta.exe','rundll32.exe','regsvr32.exe','certutil.exe')
  )
  AND starttime > NOW() - 7 DAYS
ORDER BY starttime DESC
LAST 7 DAYS
critical severity medium confidence

QRadar AQL query identifying Chrome or Edge browser processes spawning high-risk child processes that are commonly abused in post-exploitation scenarios following V8 memory corruption vulnerabilities.

Data Sources

QRadar SIEMWindows Security Event LogCrowdStrike Falcon

Required Tables

events

False Positives & Tuning

  • Automated testing pipelines using headless Chrome that invoke shell commands as part of CI/CD workflows
  • Browser-based kiosk applications with embedded shell execution for management tasks
  • Legitimate enterprise applications that use Chrome as an embedded browser and spawn child processes for functionality
  • Security awareness training platforms that may simulate browser-based attack scenarios

Other platforms for CVE-2026-3910


Testing Methodology

Validate this detection against 4 adversary techniques from Atomic Red Team. Each test below lists the behaviour to exercise and the telemetry you should expect to see. Executable commands and cleanup steps are available with Pro.

  1. Test 1Simulate Chrome Spawning PowerShell Child Process

    Expected signal: Sysmon EventID 1 showing powershell.exe with ParentImage chrome.exe; DeviceProcessEvents alert in MDE; CrowdStrike ProcessRollup2 with ParentBaseFileName=chrome.exe and FileName=powershell.exe

  2. Test 2Simulate Chrome Spawning certutil for Payload Download

    Expected signal: Sysmon EventID 1 with ParentImage chrome.exe and Image certutil.exe; network connection attempt to 127.0.0.1:8080; file creation event in C:\Windows\Temp\

  3. Test 3Simulate Chrome Crash with Access Violation Exception

    Expected signal: Windows Application EventLog EventID 1000 with Faulting application name matching the test process; exception code 0xC0000005 (STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION) visible in event data

  4. Test 4Simulate Anomalous Outbound Connection from Chrome Process

    Expected signal: Network flow log showing outbound TCP SYN to 203.0.113.1:4444 (TEST-NET-3, RFC 5737 — safe for testing); process name visible in socket tracking if using eBPF-based EDR

Unlock Pro Content

Get the full detection package for CVE-2026-3910 including response playbook, investigation guide, and atomic red team tests.

Response PlaybookInvestigation GuideHunting QueriesAtomic Red Team TestsTuning Guidance

Related Detections