CVE-2025-62221 Microsoft Windows Use After Free Exploitation
Detects exploitation attempts of CVE-2025-62221, a use-after-free vulnerability in Microsoft Windows. This class of memory corruption flaw allows attackers to execute arbitrary code by manipulating freed memory objects. As a CISA KEV entry, active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. Detection focuses on anomalous process behavior, kernel-mode memory corruption indicators, crash telemetry, and privilege escalation patterns consistent with UAF exploitation chains.
Vulnerability Intelligence
KEV — Known ExploitedAffected Software
- Vendor
- Microsoft
- Product
- Windows
Weakness (CWE)
Timeline
- Disclosed
- December 9, 2025
CVSS
What is CVE-2025-62221 CVE-2025-62221 Microsoft Windows Use After Free Exploitation?
CVE-2025-62221 Microsoft Windows Use After Free Exploitation (CVE-2025-62221) maps to the Privilege Escalation and Execution tactics — the adversary is trying to gain higher-level permissions in MITRE ATT&CK.
This page provides production-ready detection logic for CVE-2025-62221 Microsoft Windows Use After Free Exploitation, covering the data sources and telemetry it touches: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Windows Security Events, Azure Monitor. The queries below are rated critical severity at medium confidence, and ship for 7 SIEM platforms — KQL, SPL, Elastic, QRadar, Sumo, YARA-L, LogScale.
MITRE ATT&CK
- Tactic
- Privilege Escalation Execution
let timeframe = 24h;
let suspiciousProcesses = dynamic(["lsass.exe", "csrss.exe", "winlogon.exe", "services.exe", "svchost.exe"]);
union
(
SecurityEvent
| where TimeGenerated >= ago(timeframe)
| where EventID in (4688, 4689)
| where NewProcessName has_any ("exploit", "shellcode") or
(ParentProcessName in~ (suspiciousProcesses) and NewProcessName !in~ (suspiciousProcesses))
| project TimeGenerated, Computer, Account, NewProcessName, ParentProcessName, CommandLine, EventID
),
(
DeviceEvents
| where TimeGenerated >= ago(timeframe)
| where ActionType in ("ExploitGuardNetworkProtectionAudited", "ExploitGuardNetworkProtectionBlocked", "MemoryAllocationViolation", "UnexpectedKernelWriteAttempt")
| project TimeGenerated, DeviceName, ActionType, InitiatingProcessFileName, InitiatingProcessCommandLine, AdditionalFields
),
(
DeviceProcessEvents
| where TimeGenerated >= ago(timeframe)
| where InitiatingProcessIntegrityLevel == "High" and AccountName != "SYSTEM"
| where ProcessVersionInfoOriginalFileName in~ (suspiciousProcesses) or
(InitiatingProcessParentFileName in~ (suspiciousProcesses) and InitiatingProcessFileName !in~ (suspiciousProcesses))
| project TimeGenerated, DeviceName, AccountName, FileName, InitiatingProcessFileName, InitiatingProcessCommandLine
)
| extend CVE = "CVE-2025-62221"
| sort by TimeGenerated desc Detects process anomalies, memory violation events, and privilege escalation patterns consistent with CVE-2025-62221 Windows use-after-free exploitation using Defender for Endpoint and Security Event logs.
Data Sources
Required Tables
False Positives
- Legitimate software installers or update agents spawning child processes from system parents
- Security scanning tools or EDR agents performing memory inspection may trigger memory violation events
- Administrative scripts running under elevated context that spawn unusual child processes
- Crash dump collection utilities accessing process memory post-crash
Sigma rule & cross-platform mapping
The detection logic for CVE-2025-62221 Microsoft Windows Use After Free Exploitation (CVE-2025-62221) above is provided in a vendor-neutral
form so you can deploy it on any SIEM. The same logic is shipped here as native
KQL (Microsoft Sentinel / Defender), SPL (Splunk), Elastic (Elastic Security (EQL)), QRadar (IBM QRadar (AQL)), Sumo (Sumo Logic CSE), YARA-L (Google Chronicle / SecOps), LogScale (CrowdStrike LogScale (CQL)) queries. In Sigma terms, this detection targets the
following logsource:
logsource:
category: process_creation
product: windows Browse the community-maintained Sigma rules for this technique:
Platform-specific guides for CVE-2025-62221
Testing Methodology
Validate this detection against 4 adversary techniques from Atomic Red Team. Each test below lists the behaviour to exercise and the telemetry you should expect to see. Executable commands and cleanup steps are available with Pro.
- Test 1Simulate UAF-style anomalous child process from lsass.exe parent (lab only)
Expected signal: Sysmon Event ID 1 with ParentImage pointing to lsass.exe and Image of cmd.exe; Windows Security EventID 4688 with anomalous parent-child relationship
- Test 2WER crash trigger on system process to simulate pre-exploit crash artifacts
Expected signal: Windows Event ID 1000 (Application Error) and 1001 (Windows Error Reporting) in Application event log; WER report created in %LOCALAPPDATA%\Microsoft\Windows\WER\ReportQueue
- Test 3Elevated token process launch from spoofed system parent context
Expected signal: Sysmon Event ID 1 showing cmd.exe with IntegrityLevel=System spawned by psexec service; Windows Security EventID 4688 with elevated token; EventID 4672 (special privileges assigned to new logon)
- Test 4Heap spray pattern simulation via PowerShell memory allocation
Expected signal: PowerShell Script Block Logging (EventID 4104) capturing the allocation loop; potential AMSI or Defender behavioral alert on large sequential memory allocation patterns
Unlock Pro Content
Get the full detection package for CVE-2025-62221 including response playbook, investigation guide, and atomic red team tests.